Starlink’s Community Gateway on the island of Unalaska. Source: Starlink
We’re all familiar with Starlink’s direct-to-consumer-focused low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite service, which offers global low-cost, high-speed internet access. It has quickly become one of the most disruptive innovations in the worldwide telecommunications market.
Since launching its first batch of satellites in May 2019, Starlink has experienced phenomenal growth. Today, it is by far the largest satellite internet provider in the world regarding revenue. It commands a 35% market share, compared to the 16% held by SES Intelsat, used by Sure Falkland Islands for broadband connectivity.
(Image source: Alistair Schofield, LinkedIn)
However, Starlink’s Community Gateway offering differs distinctly from its residential and business services. It functions like a telecom infrastructure, delivering a high-speed data transit backhaul service to governments, enterprises, and local telecom operators.
But what exactly is backhaul? Backhaul refers to a network segment that connects edge networks, like the Falkland Islands’ terrestrial network, to the core Internet backbone, typically located in regions like the USA or Europe. Backhaul connections need to support high bandwidth and low latency. In most developed areas, this is achieved using terrestrial or undersea multi-gigabit optical fibre. However, GEO or LEO satellites are often used for backhaul in remote or underserved regions.
Sure, Falkland Islands’ Intelsat GEO satellite connection is a form of backhaul; their OneLink LEO service uses a terrestrial backhaul network via Brazil. However, both differ significantly in performance and capability from Starlink’s Community Gateway, which delivers a new level of speed and efficiency for remote backhaul applications.
Starlink Community Gateway: Who’s It Really For?
To get straight to the point, Starlink Community Gateway’s up-front one-time installation cost is $1.25m, so it is not aimed at individual consumers or small businesses. However, street prices seem to lie in the region of $900k+ after negotiation. The capacity cost is currently $75,000/month per Gbps.
Who are Starlink targeting?
-
Local telecom providers or ISPs in underserved regions: Local providers can use a Community Gateway to connect thousands of broadband customers to the Internet backbone.
-
Governments & NGOs: Especially for disaster recovery, rural education, the military, and emergency response.
-
Large enterprises such as oil rigs, mining sites, and remote factories.
Inside the radome: (Source Reddit)
Nauru became the first South Pacific nation to sign up for Starlink’s Community Gateway service.
What Can the Community Gateway Provide?
Starlink positions the Community Gateway as a “Plug & Play” or “Fibre Alternative” for places where laying physical infrastructure is impractical or expensive. Its principal technical benefits are as follows:
-
Up to symmetrical 10 Gbps up and down (This compares to OneWeb’s 550 Mbps)
-
Low latency (under 100 ms)
-
99% uptime
-
Public IPv4 and IPv6 support
- Enterprise-grade reliability.
Starlink Gateway traffic will take multiple satellite and terrestrial paths to improve availability and performance – a single 10 Gbps VPN tunnel is not supported.
Hardware & Installation
- Each Community Gateway utilises four Ka-band parabolic antennas, typically enclosed in radomes. These dishes are approximately 1.4 meters in diameter and weigh around 250 kg each.
- Line of Sight: A minimum 25-degree above-horizon line-of-sight is required for optimal performance.
-
Installation: Each antenna can be installed on the ground with an optional concrete base 1.85m x 1.85m with hooks for lifting 1300 kg.
- Power Requirements: Each antenna operates at an average power of 1 kW, with enhanced power provisions for extreme weather conditions – 4 kw per antenna required in snow conditions.
I’m not at all knowledgeabl about this technology, but could this be a solution to very isolated places in camp? This just a question and I would be happy to be instructed about this. I do feel very concerned about how our isolated camp places are provided for.
Hi Griz,
That installation would only work for a town like Stanley, and if there is fibre between it and mpc/mare harbour, then those places too. If fibre is run along the mpa road, then it would be possible to have a branch go to Fitzroy for example.
It doesn’t help places like Fox Bay or South Harbour, and tiny settlements like those would be better served by getting Starlink dishes. They have extremely good performance compared to “near competitors” and require significantly less power to operate. Also, you have flexibility, and can lift-n-shift it to wherever you need it to be, like the shearing-shed, for example.
Trying to upgrade all the towers to handle modern bandwidth requirements is likely to be a fool’s errand, unless Sure decides to fully embrace 5G or plans for better. Putting in the junk that they do currently – with user guides last updated almost a decade ago – does not fill me with confidence. And, yes, I’m talking March 2025!
The sentences I like to read are:
“Lasers in space travel about 30-40% faster than signals through fibre.”
and, of course
“According to a recent SpaceX application for additional FCC licences in the USA, SpaceX stated that …earth stations will simultaneously communicate with up to eight Gen1 satellites and up to thirty-two Gen2 satellites.”
I.T. folks call that ‘scalability’.